
On March 22, we concluded the volunteering portion of our time in Thailand. It was a nice day. We brought in donuts for the kids. We have found that they like us more when we give them things. Go figure?! After an hour or so of English, each of the boys lined up and offered roses to Melissa and me. Each approached us individually and handed us a rose, gave us a short bow and said, in English (kind of), “thank you.” It was a touching gesture, even though it was clear that the boys were merely doing this at the request of the administration. This was followed by lunch with the Director of the facility. He barely speaks a word of English, so there were many awkward silences, but that too was a sweet gesture on his part. We then returned to do our final English class for the staff, and were then given a warm farewell. We seemed to spend hours taking photos with every possible combination of students and staff—many more than seemed warranted given we had spent a total of seven days with them. It was as though we were foreign dignitaries and they needed to document our visit for posterity.
Melissa and I ended up enjoying our placement at the juvenile detention center. Although, I think I enjoyed it more than Melissa. Melissa felt, with some justification, that teaching English to the juvies was not really a real value-add to the juvie’s lives and that they found the placement to make sure we had something to do. She may be right, but I see it a bit differently. I think they enjoyed their time with us and, while learning English is not (as it was in Tanzania) a true prerequisite to economic advancement, it certainly has some value and I also think that, at a minimum, we’re positive role models. If nothing else, they saw it as a fun break from an otherwise dull routine.
During the last few days of the placement, one of the staff members, who had been on vacation when we started volunteering, joined us as prime liaison between Melissa and me and the kids. This woman seemed absolutely psychotic to us. Indeed, she seemed to be possessed of the stalker personality. She would continually interrupt us, as we were teaching the kids to offer us food or to simply chat with us. It was very odd. She also fashioned herself as a competent English speaker. Now, in fairness to her, her English was better than our Thai, but that ain’t saying much. But even this was a source of irritation to us. As we were working with the kids, she would give them the answers to our various questions (she did the same when we taught the staff). It was very annoying and completely bizarre.
Also, the Thai people have a tendency to not want to admit when they don’t understand something, which is both funny and frustrating. This behavior seemed even more pronounced in our psychotic administrator. She would continually say “yes” to questions that she either did not understand at all or required a more nuanced response. For instance, at the class with the staff:
Melissa: Will you please ask the Assistant Director (one of our students) to describe her role here.
Psychotic Administrator: Yes (smiling widely).
Melissa: Great. [But the Psychotic Administrator did not say anything to the Assistant Director].
Melissa: So please tell the Assistant Director to describe her job duties.
Psychotic Administrator: Yes (still smiling) [again nothing happened].
Melissa (her patience beginning to fray): So you will ask the Assistant Director to describe her job duties, lplease?
Psychotic Administrator: Yes (still smiling) [Again nothing happened.]
Melissa then jumped across the table and slowly strangled the Psychotic Administrator, while I and the other staff smiled widely. Okay, that part did not happen, but that was my consistent fantasy.
While, I ended up somewhat enjoying our volunteer placement, our experience in Trang CCS paled by comparison to our experience in Tanzania. Melissa and I are still frustrated and extremely disappointed in CCS Thailand, particularly given how much we paid to volunteer. Besides having absolutely nothing for us to do for our first week (1/3 of our time there) we are now even more frustrated that CCS has not offered us anything other than platitudes for the failure of the organization to provide what was promised. Our kids continued to do their separate placements at two local pre-schools and they seemed fairly happy with the opportunity and enjoyed experiences with Thai children. However, somewhat like our own placements, it felt as if they were just thrown into an environment irrespective of actual need. Feeling unneeded can be demoralizing. While the needs in Thailand in general are clearly not as great as in Tanzania, it’s hard to imagine that our time (including the kids’) could not have been put to better use.
The experience at the CCS home base was also very different than the experience we enjoyed in Tanzania. I know that our friends, the Levines, are sick to death of hearing us drone on and on about Tanzania, but the fact is that, but for the Levines being there, the experience simply paled by comparison. Melissa and I have talked about this and have concluded that there are a number of reasons.
First, as we have already discussed, the failure to have a placement when we arrived was irksome. It was even worse having to experience the Levines lack of placement for much longer, and even once their placements were supposedly set, it was still very much day by day for them.
Second, the community that we had here in Thailand was simply not what it was in Tanzania. We really made some good friends in Tanzania, both Tanzanian and Western. There are many people that we will endeavor to keep in touch with, who we want to see again. They embraced us and our kids with warmth and generosity. Indeed, many of them are wonderful role models for our daughters. In my view there were three factors contributing to the lack of community in Thailand (the first two of which I think are the direct fault of CCS). First, the staff at Tanzania CCS worked extremely hard to establish community. It was clearly a priority. One simple example is that we had all of our meals at the same time. For instance, at 6:50 pm or so, people would start lining up and at 7:00 the bell rang and dinner began. As part of this, we also had the benefit of eating our meals with the staff and their children. In this way, not only were they fostering the community of volunteers, but were also fostering organic connections with Tanzanians. In contrast, the leadership at CCS Trang did nothing to cultivate friendship among the volunteers. Using the meal example again, at 6:00 pm or so, the staff at Trang would put dinner on the kitchen table and we could eat whenever we wanted. So people quickly siloed into their own groups and there was very little interaction. Moreover, we did not eat meals with the staff, so that we did not even get the benefit of that experience. We learned that one aspect of Thai society is that it is very hierarchical, which probably explains the CCS Thailand rule that staff and volunteers had to eat separately. CCS Trang’s idea of cultural exchange was, for instance, setting up a Thai cooking class or taking us to see a Thai boxing match. While such activities are fun and even interesting, it is hard to feel part of the community when you are acting as little more than an attendee at a lecture. I think that this is, in part, explained by the fact that the leader at Trang (who, incidentally, seems to have either quit or been fired before the conclusion of our time there and disappeared one day without saying a word to anyone, including the rest of the staff), was a tour operator. While, in stark contrast, the leaders in Tanzania spent many years working with the Peace Corps.
Second, the location of the homebase was not ideal. It was far outside of downtown Trang and there was very limited public transportation. Therefore, it was very difficult to just stop by a bar or a restaurant to hang out with local Thais. In Tanzania, the homebase was close to local artists and a bar, where we could go and hang out with locals, in a very casual, comfortable manner. The consistent evening activity in Trang was the ride to Tesco, which is essentially a Wal-Mart. Thrilling.
Third, the bulk of our fellow volunteers were, shall, I say, limited. I realize that I cannot blame CCS for this. Although, as noted above, their efforts to cultivate community were non-existent. While it may be impolitic to write about our fellow volunteers on a public blog, I feel no constraint with regard to our Trang compatriots. The likelihood that they would look at our blog is small and, if they did, they might even benefit from the forthcoming constructive criticism. Despite my inclination to give you their names, the lawyer in me knows that’s unwise. So the following are my assessments:
The Love Birds. These two post-high school kids are quite the couple. He is of average height, very thin and I don’t believe that he has yet sprouted facial hair. Neither Ed nor I have seen him shave (we all share a bathroom). Despite occasional attempts at conversation with him, in the three weeks, that we have been here, I believe that he has not said more than 50 words to us. No exaggeration. I can’t figure out if he’s actually unfriendly are merely extraordinarily shy or socially awkward (this coming from a person, who brings social awkwardness to new heights). Ed and I are convinced that were we never to say hi or good morning or whatever, he would simply never speak to us. I tested that theory before we left and sure enough he would walk right by me without saying a word. Keep in mind, that we lived in relatively close quarters. I actually kind of like his girlfriend. She’s clearly smart, interesting and is much more personable. However, I think she’s so consumed with their first love (I’m assuming here) that it seems to hinder her sociability. Perhaps I’m going out on a limb here, but I think they are of the view that they are intense and complicated people, who we, as old and uncool 40 year olds, simply cannot comprehend.
The Sorority Girl. Without intending this to be a full broadside attack at women who join sororities, there is no better description for her. She’s taking a brief break from a small East Coast liberal arts college to do this program. That I applaud. However, she seems extraordinarily preoccupied with perfecting her tan and limiting her volunteer obligations, to the greatest extent possible. Indeed, her failure to take her volunteering seriously is almost admirable in its sheer audacity. One weekend she and a few other volunteers went up to Bangkok. After missing the first two flights back for questionably legitimate reasons, she missed the third flight because she was out partying. Indeed, her traveling companion was quite concerned because that night the sorority girl left her saying that she would be right back and never returned, which also resulted in her traveling companion missing the third flight. At times, I wish I felt unconstrained by responsibility and obligation.
The High School Girl. This young woman came to Thailand for two weeks of volunteering during one of her school breaks from her senior year at boarding school. She’s seems fairly smart and reasonably well traveled. However, she is what I will refer to as aggressively granola. She has this judgmental manner, thoroughly consistent with the vast amount of experience and wisdom she has gained in her 18 years on the planet. As an example, we attended a Thai Boxing demonstration, which was both fun and interesting. We all got into the ring and were taught some basic moves. Melissa asked her whether she was going to join the demonstration, to which she haughtily responded “I don’t do violence.”
Now, off to Northern Thailand.